Logo Design
Logo Design
Before Starting the creation of my own logo I wanted to see and research other official major company logos; such as how they are presented and identified by the audience.
Within every logo, there was a big resemblance of the presentation and significance. such as colour scheme, fonts and effects. What I simply mean by this is that people react to colours and fonts very differently due to what can be encoded and suggested for example I've gathered some intel on the emotional connection of colours and their psychological effects too
While creating the logo there were a few major points I researched and needed to achieve for me to have been presenting a successful product such as,
how is the logo embodying my brand itself:
The first impression is will be everything to new-coming brands such as myself due to that reason I used my name and simply it to create a high-quality logo easy to understand and decode. My brand is quite unique in how it's presented for the audience and a character overall and I wanted to imprint that into the logo, there are many logos presented and marketed like mine.
FedEx logo by Lindon Leader
FedEx has used the same logo since 1994 and it's now the base of the brand as a whole. What makes that logo special is the strategically placed arrow between the letters E and X, which adds excitement to the consumer especially when they discover this treasure for the very first time. The arrow is a significant element that upholds the company's goals and purpose. FedEx is a business that was founded on the principle of fast delivery due to that reason the arrow is representing the visual elements of their speed and efficiency creating symbolistic meaning. How the arrow was created was futuristic due to the execution of the spacing and its perfect within that there is also the bold colours standing out nicely with their white packages. The FedEx logo is honest and straight to the point.
Tour de France Logo by Joel Guenoun
Another company with the importance of embodying a logo is Le Tour De France, taking a look at successfully presenting a modern spin of the message given by tour de France is very important because this logo has had several iterations but it has remained alike since 2002 rebranding. What created this rebranding so unique was its drastic change from past logos which felt stale and corporated, to the current logo which is seen as creative and audacious.
Within the logo, there was a very clear message: the letters and symbols form an active cyclist on a ride. This embodied the logo with excitement and movement by a major sporting event in addition to the bike element the script feels fluid and full of motion while the logo is very athletic resembling through artistic vision but also representing a gold medalist.
With Le Tour De France we explored how good a logo was significantly for their audience now we'll check the not-so-great logo which doesn't embody the brand and doesn't get the message across. London hosted the 2012 Olympics and while the event was realised with anticipation and enthusiasm, the logo couldn't deliver to these high standers.
The sports community enjoyed criticizing the none structured shape with neon colours marked as a logo. It was considered too retro-inspired for the year 2012 and was made fun of critically of its resemblance to Lisa Simpson's Hair.
Although that wasn't the main issue, the issues went beyond shapes and colours, as this logo also didn't fulfil its overall purpose: conveying the important message of an Olympic sprint. Everyone knows that the Olympics are all about global performing athletes coming together for the love of their sport and country. Just like the interlocking Olympic rings in the parent logo, any corresponding Olympic logo should display a sense of togetherness and unity which is the main responsibility for a gathering such as this. The pulled-apart pieces in the London log were almost embarrassed to display. They came across as disconnected; almost as if they'd had an argument and were parting away. Famed design firm Wolff Olins has stood by his creation but many onlookers are continuing to disagree.
Will my logo be aesthetically pleasing to my audience:
For a logo to be aesthetically pleasing it shouldn't just look good but also acclimate well to any space desired, also needs it'll need to have a sense of individuality. A quality logo will be adaptable in various environments and unique to its overall brand. I've found two aesthetic concepts that big individual logos use.
A quality alike logo is highly adaptable, very much like chameleons: they can be presentable and recognizable in any place due to the selective colour scheme the logo is unique. Logo quality shouldn't be impacted by where the logo is big or small, it's more towards the adaptability of a logo rather than size.
A very unique brand is Adidas. The global brand actually has several similar but different logo variations to offer for their audience. Adidas does that because these logos always look good regardless of the place, usually, the Adidas logo would be seen on clothing or accessories but it can easily work elsewhere (Football, Gym bags and etc). They're obviously a sports-focused brand but more so, they are very versatile.
Verizon for example has a tough sport in adapting its logo. Despite several redesigns, their logo still isn't quite as outstanding. A logo should be aesthetically pleasing, but Verizon's rally doesn't have that pleasing look for it like Adidas it's simple and good but less sometimes is more and this logo particularly wanted to look billboard worthy or t-shirt wearable but it wouldn't make you feel good to wear that company logo because of its value being off course.
Due to saying that A quality logo is uniquely presented, nobody enjoys a copycat or a generic logo that blends into the crowd. It can lead to a lack of identity presentation as well as confusion for the consumers.
PayPal and Pandora are practically confusing in mobile use because of how similar they are. More and more brands are becoming mobile usable and due to that factor when you think about your logo's unique ability and simplicity designers forget about the factor of being an app icon too.
Will, there be a memorable identity in my logo:
Some of the best logos in the world are widely identified. But being memorable and identifiable can mean many things.
After getting a basic understanding of how much there is to the audience's resemblance of colours and psychological effects I chose to go more with bright and outgoing colours while the background is more sudden and really overall absorbing.
This is the Logo for my Portfolio:
This is my Personal Logo:
After successfully creating and designing my logo there was a simple practice I needed to imply to present more creativity and make my product qualify for quality. While evaluating my logo I've seen some elements from other cultures presented in the fonts and colours which I was impressed by due to the fact of how hard it was to complete that stage; I sincerely wanted to communicate with the audience in a fresh way. just by giving a glance at the logos, there would be a construct of welcoming and quality design connected.
Feedback for the final designed logos
Questions: What do you think about the logos?
I love how the "Digital Portfolio" is designed and presented with both different file exports png and jpeg. Your logo "K.MARINOV" has very cool and explosive details and also love that it's your initials.
I really like them both and they are both very impressive because it takes lots of skill to have some unique idea like this one and execute it so well, the first logo has the colour scheme of your website which makes it look slicker and fire.
Comments
Post a Comment